MICHAEL BERNARD BLUM v HER MAJESTY’S REVENUE & CUSTOMS

Decision date: 23 July 2013

Neutral citation: [2013] UKUT 304 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal concerned the open‑market value on 31 March 1982 of a converted small office property at 48 Station Road, Harrow for CGT re‑basing. The Tribunal accepted HMRC’s valuer’s rental relativities and an 8% yield, fixed the annual rent at £11,000 and determined the freehold value at £137,500 as at that date. HMRC were awarded their costs from 5 January 2013.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

Where comparable evidence does not show a consistent difference between floors in small office buildings without lifts, a tribunal may treat ground and first floors as having no material rental differential; and, in cases with limited comparable yield evidence, a tribunal may select an appropriate yield from the best available but limited comparables and adjust the valuation accordingly.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The judgment indicates that auction sale evidence and dissimilar mixed‑use investment comparables may have limited usefulness when assessing yields for small office investments, and that zoning or retail comparables should be translated appropriately before informing office rent assessments.

Warning

The chunk contains repeated and duplicated passages of the judgment which may affect flow. Notes contain repeated and duplicated passages which may affect completeness and flow.