Gary Edward Hanson & Anor v Desmond Theorore Harding & Ors

Decision date: 7 March 2025

Neutral citation: [2025] UKUT 78 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerns the premium payable for a lease extension where the registered freeholders cannot be found and the FTT had added a £20,000 sum as immediately payable development compensation for loft-conversion potential. The Upper Tribunal held that the £20,000 represented an attribute of the property to be taken into account under Schedule 13 paragraph 3 (and not separate paragraph 5 compensation) and should be deferred to the reversion, set aside the FTT’s approach and determined the premium at £10,884. The decision was allowed with no remittal to the FTT.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

The tribunal’s ratio is that future improvement potential which is an attribute of the property must be included in the landlord’s freehold value under Schedule 13 paragraph 3 and, where that value is not immediately realisable by the landlord, reflected by deferment to the reversionary date when calculating diminution in value; it is not automatically to be treated as separate, immediately payable development compensation under paragraph 5.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The judgment contains observations that a tribunal should not advance fresh reasons when refusing permission to appeal that were not part of its original decision, and that the rule excluding tenant’s improvements aims to avoid making leaseholders pay twice for value they already provided (a Law Commission policy point).