GPS (Great Britain) Limited v Samuel Charles David Bird (VO)

Decision date: 21 November 2013

Neutral citation: [2013] UKUT 527 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal concerned whether the opening of the Highcross extension in Leicester on 4 September 2008 constituted a relevant material change of circumstances (MCC) affecting rateable values at Fosse Park as at the hypothetical valuation date, and if so what reduction was justified. The Tribunal found the opening was capable of being an MCC and, relying on contemporaneous retail consultants' forecasts and comparative turnover data, concluded a 10% reduction in rateable values was reasonable. The appeals were allowed and the 2005 rating list was altered effective 4 September 2008.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

Contemporaneous retail consultants' forecasts and suitably benchmarked comparative turnover data are admissible and probative evidence of what a hypothetical tenant would have anticipated and may justify an MCC adjustment to rateable value; by contrast, evidence of recent lettings may have limited weight where size, timing and market context differ.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The Tribunal indicated that reliance on informal comments by arbitrators or inaccessible arbitrators' views is inadmissible and of no assistance, and that MCC adjustments from other locales may lack comparative value where geographic, catchment and scheme differences are material.