Simon Fletcher & Anor v Portsmouth City Council

Decision date: 26 June 2026

Neutral citation: [2026] UKUT 234 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal concerns challenges by the Fletchers to standard HMO licence conditions Portsmouth City Council imposed, in particular condition 18 requiring written tenancy terms and production to the council "on demand" (interpreted as seven days). The Upper Tribunal reviewed whether the FTT applied the correct standard of review and whether condition 18 (and its production requirement) was lawful under s.67 and Schedule 4 of the Housing Act 2004. The Tribunal proceeded to consider each ground and indicated it would, if it found error, vary contested conditions itself rather than remit.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

The judgment identifies the correct appellate task as deciding whether the FTT was wrong in its determination, with appropriate deference to the licensing authority’s evaluative judgment; and it frames the lawfulness of licence conditions by reference to s.67 (including limits on imposing obligations on third parties and on altering tenancy terms) and the mandatory requirements in Schedule 4.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The decision remarks that the local authority’s practice of applying a standard set of licence conditions across all licences may be material to assessing appropriateness but must conform to statutory constraints; it also notes that the Tribunal may take into account cost and delay when deciding whether to decide variations itself rather than remit to the FTT.