Nonyelu Okoye v Gray’s Inn Capital Limited

Decision date: 20 June 2025

Neutral citation: [2025] UKUT 195 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal concerned whether insurance service charges levied by the landlord for 2014–2023 included cover beyond the lease-defined "Insured Risks", such that tenants were overcharged. The Upper Tribunal upheld the First-tier Tribunal, finding summary policy documents showed no cover for business interruption or book debts and that a single £5m owners' liability item did not establish a prima facie case of over-insurance. The appeal was dismissed and the service-charge allowances were upheld.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

A tenant challenging an insurance service-charge must produce evidence giving rise to a prima facie case of unreasonable cost; merely alleging that a landlord's policy covers additional risks is insufficient unless the tenant shows those items could be omitted and that omission would materially reduce the premium. Tribunal findings can be upheld where summary policy documents in the tribunal bundle demonstrate the actual cover corresponds to the lease requirements.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The tribunal observed that reliance on summary cover sheets earlier might have led to refusal of permission to appeal, and that a generic insurer policy document does not necessarily determine the cover for a particular property where specific "Summary of Cover" sheets exist.

Warning

The chunk contains substantial repetition and duplicated passages which make it somewhat noisy. notes contain substantial repetition and duplicated passages; they may be somewhat noisy.