(1) JONATHAN HOWARD ROBERTS (2) JANET ANN THAIN v MARIA MERCEDES FERNANDEZ

Decision date: 23 March 2015

Neutral citation: [2015] UKUT 106 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerned the premium payable to extend a 72‑year lease of flat No.70 Andace Park Gardens, focusing on relativity, possible onerous lease adjustments, the deferment rate and the capitalisation rate. The Upper Tribunal accepted the F-tT's use of RICS market relativity graphs, rejected proposed adjustments for onerous lease features, reduced the deferment rate to 5.25% and increased the landlord's capitalisation rate to 7%, but dismissed the appeal as the net change to the premium was de minimis (premium ~£10,052).

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

Where available and reliable, RICS graphs and demonstrable market evidence should be given weight in assessing relativity; valuation adjustments (for onerous lease features or different rates) require specific, reliable evidence demonstrating altered market risk or expectations, and prior LVT decisions are not binding and carry limited evidential weight.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

Sales data lacking detail (condition, floor level, improvements, presence of a lift) are of limited use for relativity; a reversionary right to 1% of sale proceeds is an attractive reversion feature but irrelevant to compensation if it survives the lease extension; alleged management failings do not justify an uplift for obsolescence risk absent evidence that competent management will not be in place.