Investview Limited v Tandridge District Council

Decision date: 11 December 2025

Neutral citation: [2025] UKUT 405 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: medium

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: medium

This appeal concerns prohibition orders served on 15 self-contained flats at Survey House for a Category 2 "crowding and space" hazard under the HHSRS, upheld by the First-tier Tribunal. The FTT rejected the use of HMO size standards by analogy for self-contained flats, accepted NDSS and the Metric Handbook as relevant comparators, and accepted the local authority's HHSRS scoring placing the hazard in Band D, thereby upholding the orders. The appellant obtained permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on whether HMO standards were wrongly disregarded and whether the HHSRS calculation was properly accepted.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: medium

The FTT recorded and applied a principle that HMO-derived space standards, being created for a distinct regulatory regime, are not of weight when assessing crowding and space hazards under the HHSRS for self-contained flats; instead, nationally prescribed space standards (NDSS) and recognized design guides such as the Metric Handbook may be treated as appropriate comparators in such HHSRS assessments.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The FTT observed (without treating it as determinative) that compliance with planning permission or building regulations does not necessarily preclude a finding of an HHSRS crowding and space hazard, and noted the possible influence of Decent Homes inspections and the adoption of NPSS/NDSS in planning guidance on HHSRS assessments.