Kimberley Ruth Sing Tze Moh & Ors v Rimal Properties Limited

Decision date: 18 October 2024

Neutral citation: [2024] UKUT 324 (LC)

Overall AI summary confidence: high

AI Notice: Any short overview, ratio decidendi summary or obiter dicta summary shown on this page is AI-generated, provided only to help users assess potential relevance more quickly, and may be wholly inaccurate. No liability is accepted for the accuracy of any such summary, regardless of any AI confidence rating shown. Users should check the underlying decision and obtain appropriate legal advice rather than relying on any summary.

Short overview

This short overview is intended to summarise the case, issues and outcome so far as they are supported by the judgment.

AI confidence in this short overview: high

This appeal concerned how to compute the "period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made" in s.41(2)(b) of the Housing and Planning Act 2016 and when a s.72 Housing Act 2004 defence takes effect on the day an application/notification (or reasonable endeavours) is made. The Tribunal held the 12‑month period is made of whole days and starts at the first moment of the day after the corresponding date a year earlier, and that a s.72 defence, where engaged, applies to the whole day on which the qualifying act occurs. Applying those conclusions the tenants’ applications were out of time and both appeals were dismissed.

Ratio decidendi

This summary is intended to identify the ratio decidendi, meaning the legal reasons for deciding and the binding part of the decision.

AI confidence in this ratio decidendi summary: high

The decision applies a whole‑day rule: when a statute refers to "the period of 12 months ending with the day on which the application is made" that period comprises whole days and begins at the first moment of the day after the corresponding date one year earlier; and, for the purposes of s.72 defences, fractions of a day are to be disregarded so that the day on which an application, notification or reasonable endeavour occurs may be treated as wholly within the defence.

Obiter dicta

This summary is intended to identify obiter dicta, meaning observations made by the way that were not necessary to deciding the case and are not binding.

AI confidence in this obiter dicta summary: medium

The judgment observes (obiter) that authorities on computing limitation periods, and practical difficulties such as website failures, support treating days as whole and deeming the day of a qualifying act within a defence to avoid impractical factual inquiries, though those authorities do not directly determine when a defence arises.